Bloomberg Businessweek Customer Service Issues

Account Number: [redacted] I have been a loyal BusinessWeek subscriber for more than a decade. I have a few concerns that I'd like to address: 1. My subscription ended on Nov 20, [redacted], and I haven't received any renewal or expiry emails. 2. When I called yesterday, I was quoted CAD $99 for a one-year renewal, with no mention of any discounts despite the website's claims. 3. As a longstanding subscriber, I expected some loyalty discount or acknowledgement, which was not provided. 4. There has been a significant increase in subscription fees since my last renewal two years ago, which seems excessive given inflation rates. 5. I reached out through the website's customer service portal, but their response did not address my concerns. 6. Could you please let me know the best rate available to me as a loyal customer? Looking forward to your response, Patti

Subject: Request to Stop Sending Bloomberg Businessweek Magazine To Whom It May Concern, I have tried repeatedly to request that Bloomberg Businessweek Magazine cease its delivery to our office. There is no active subscription from anyone at our organization, especially since Dennis Brown has been retired for five years and never signed up. As a paperless company, the Equipment Leasing and Finance Association does not wish to receive physical copies of the publication due to environmental concerns. Should we decide to subscribe, it will be done electronically. Your cooperation in discontinuing these deliveries is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Ray J., Administrative Manager.

I read the Coronavirus newsletter on my phone daily and I am concerned about the outbreak and the panic it is causing. Panic seems to spread faster than the virus itself. I noticed the newsletter shows countries shaded in red where the virus is found, but the whole country is shaded, which might increase panic. The shades of red and pink can be confusing. Could a less alarming graphic be used to accurately show the affected areas without causing unnecessary panic among readers who may not analyze it closely?

I am disappointed by the lack of professionalism in the BTS article published yesterday. It contained numerous inaccuracies that could have been avoided with a simple Google search. The portrayal of the fandom as political activists was offensive, as the reality is they are not interested in politics. The article wrongly depicted the fandom as American-centric when it is an international community. OIAA had contacted your organization, and the article was filled with false information and taken out of context. This article has incited Trump supporters to attack fans of the group. I urge you to remove the article, issue a public apology to BTS, their fanbase, and OIAA for breaching the Code of Ethics. The fans just want to support the group they love without being dragged into American politics. Please refrain from writing any further BTS articles if you are unwilling to conduct proper research. #LEAVE BTSARMY ALONE.